{"ab":false,"abStatus":null,"abTestId":null,"abVariation":false,"abVariationAutomated":false,"absoluteUrl":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one","afterPostBody":null,"aifeatures":null,"allowedSlugConflict":false,"analytics":null,"analyticsPageId":"2962789770","analyticsPageType":"blog-post","approvalStatus":null,"archived":false,"archivedAt":0,"archivedInDashboard":false,"areCommentsAllowed":true,"attachedStylesheets":[],"audienceAccess":"PUBLIC","author":null,"authorName":null,"authorUsername":null,"blogAuthor":{"avatar":"","bio":"","cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"cosObjectType":"BLOG_AUTHOR","created":1433874476086,"deletedAt":0,"displayName":"Jeff Young","email":"","facebook":"","fullName":"Jeff Young","gravatarUrl":null,"hasSocialProfiles":false,"id":2952418078,"label":"Jeff Young","language":"en","linkedin":"","name":"Jeff Young","portalId":61352,"slug":"jeff-young","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"twitter":"","twitterUsername":"","updated":1666901749443,"userId":null,"username":null,"website":""},"blogAuthorId":2952418078,"blogPostAuthor":{"avatar":"","bio":"","cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"cosObjectType":"BLOG_AUTHOR","created":1433874476086,"deletedAt":0,"displayName":"Jeff Young","email":"","facebook":"","fullName":"Jeff Young","gravatarUrl":null,"hasSocialProfiles":false,"id":2952418078,"label":"Jeff Young","language":"en","linkedin":"","name":"Jeff Young","portalId":61352,"slug":"jeff-young","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"twitter":"","twitterUsername":"","updated":1666901749443,"userId":null,"username":null,"website":""},"blogPostScheduleTaskUid":null,"blogPublishInstantEmailCampaignId":null,"blogPublishInstantEmailRetryCount":null,"blogPublishInstantEmailTaskUid":"DONE","blogPublishToSocialMediaTask":"DONE_NOT_SENT","blueprintTypeId":0,"businessUnitId":null,"campaign":"816ef4f9-d3e3-4b22-a990-d1664954a69f","campaignName":"musicians","campaignUtm":"musicians","category":3,"categoryId":3,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"checkPostLevelAudienceAccessFirst":true,"clonedFrom":null,"composeBody":null,"compositionId":0,"contentAccessRuleIds":[],"contentAccessRuleTypes":[],"contentGroup":952267656,"contentGroupId":952267656,"contentTypeCategory":3,"contentTypeCategoryId":3,"contentTypeId":null,"created":1433870252000,"createdById":313859,"createdTime":1433870252000,"crmObjectId":null,"css":{},"cssText":"","ctaClicks":null,"ctaViews":null,"currentState":"PUBLISHED","currentlyPublished":true,"deletedAt":0,"deletedBy":null,"deletedByEmail":null,"deletedById":null,"domain":"","dynamicPageDataSourceId":null,"dynamicPageDataSourceType":null,"dynamicPageHubDbTableId":null,"enableDomainStylesheets":null,"enableGoogleAmpOutputOverride":false,"enableLayoutStylesheets":null,"errors":[],"featuredImage":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg","featuredImageAltText":"Marvin Gaye sidewalk star","featuredImageHeight":400,"featuredImageLength":0,"featuredImageWidth":600,"flexAreas":{},"folderId":null,"footerHtml":null,"freezeDate":1434571163000,"generateJsonLdEnabledOverride":true,"hasContentAccessRules":false,"hasUserChanges":true,"headHtml":null,"header":null,"htmlTitle":"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One","id":2962789770,"includeDefaultCustomCss":null,"isCaptchaRequired":true,"isCrawlableByBots":false,"isDraft":false,"isInstanceLayoutPage":false,"isInstantEmailEnabled":true,"isPublished":true,"isSocialPublishingEnabled":false,"keywords":[],"label":"<span id=\"hs_cos_wrapper_name\" class=\"hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text\" style=\"\" data-hs-cos-general-type=\"meta_field\" data-hs-cos-type=\"text\" >Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One</span>","language":"en","lastEditSessionId":null,"lastEditUpdateId":null,"layoutSections":{},"legacyBlogTabid":null,"legacyId":null,"legacyPostGuid":null,"linkRelCanonicalUrl":"","listTemplate":"prox_frontrow/templates/blog/blog-listing.html","liveDomain":"www.frontrowinsurance.com","mab":false,"mabExperimentId":null,"mabMaster":false,"mabVariant":false,"meta":{"meta_description":"Marvin Gaye vs. Robin Thicke and Pharrel Williams. Lawyer gives us the opportunity to learn his thought processes from all three of his perspectives.","author_username":"nedia@frontrowinsurance.com","blog_publish_instant_email_task_uid":"DONE","use_featured_image":true,"topic_ids":[949436814,949708814,949708924,2961176071],"author_user_id":4012692,"rss_summary":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n","featured_image":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg","keywords":[],"campaign_name":"musicians","post_summary":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n","has_user_changes":true,"html_title":"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One","post_body":"\n\n\n\n <span id=\"hs_cos_wrapper_post_body\" class=\"hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_rich_text\" style=\"\" data-hs-cos-general-type=\"meta_field\" data-hs-cos-type=\"rich_text\" ><p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p></span>\n","publish_immediately":true,"author_email":"nedia@frontrowinsurance.com","rss_body":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p>","placement_guids":[],"campaign_utm":"musicians","css":{},"featured_image_alt_text":"Marvin Gaye sidewalk star","enable_google_amp_output_override":false,"css_text":"","last_edit_session_id":null,"last_edit_update_id":null,"tag_ids":[949436814,949708814,949708924,2961176071],"link_rel_canonical_url":"","published_by_id":7915797,"published_at":1706811681135,"blog_publish_to_social_media_task":"DONE_NOT_SENT","head_html":null,"scheduled_update_date":0,"layout_sections":{},"public_access_rules_enabled":false,"public_access_rules":[],"featured_image_height":400,"featured_image_width":600,"blog_post_schedule_task_uid":null,"header":null},"metaDescription":"Marvin Gaye vs. Robin Thicke and Pharrel Williams. Lawyer gives us the opportunity to learn his thought processes from all three of his perspectives.","metaKeywords":null,"name":"<span id=\"hs_cos_wrapper_name\" class=\"hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text\" style=\"\" data-hs-cos-general-type=\"meta_field\" data-hs-cos-type=\"text\" >Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One</span>","nextPostFeaturedImage":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/social-network-founder-shutterstock_2066914112-forweb600.jpg","nextPostFeaturedImageAltText":"Social Network Founder: Making a Bio Pic without Permission","nextPostName":"The Delicate Art of Making a Bio Pic w/o Getting Permission (Part 3)","nextPostSlug":"articles/the-social-network-without-getting-permission-from-mark-zuckerberg-part-3","pageExpiryDate":null,"pageExpiryEnabled":null,"pageExpiryRedirectId":null,"pageExpiryRedirectUrl":null,"pageRedirected":false,"pageTitle":"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One","parentBlog":{"absoluteUrl":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles","allowComments":true,"ampBodyColor":"#404040","ampBodyFont":"'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif","ampBodyFontSize":"18","ampCustomCss":"","ampHeaderBackgroundColor":"#ffffff","ampHeaderColor":"#1e1e1e","ampHeaderFont":"'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif","ampHeaderFontSize":"36","ampLinkColor":"#416bb3","ampLogoAlt":"Front Row Insurance logo","ampLogoHeight":63,"ampLogoSrc":"https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/61352/front-row-logo.png","ampLogoWidth":175,"analyticsPageId":137640,"attachedStylesheets":[],"audienceAccess":"PUBLIC","businessUnitId":null,"captchaAfterDays":7,"captchaAlways":false,"categoryId":3,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"closeCommentsOlder":0,"commentDateFormat":"medium","commentFormGuid":"7a447743-bbf2-4b55-a759-b405bf392a7d","commentMaxThreadDepth":3,"commentModeration":true,"commentNotificationEmails":["mike@frontrowinsurance.com","grant@frontrowinsurance.com"],"commentShouldCreateContact":true,"commentVerificationText":"","cosObjectType":"BLOG","created":1401900293000,"createdDateTime":1401900293000,"dailyNotificationEmailId":"952268096","dateFormattingLanguage":"en_US","defaultGroupStyleId":"","defaultNotificationFromName":"","defaultNotificationReplyTo":"","deletedAt":0,"description":"The Front Row Insurance Blog where you can learn and converse about all things entertainment insurance related.","domain":"","domainWhenPublished":"www.frontrowinsurance.com","emailApiSubscriptionId":283237,"enableGoogleAmpOutput":true,"enableSocialAutoPublishing":false,"generateJsonLdEnabled":false,"header":null,"htmlFooter":"<!-- DELTA-->","htmlFooterIsShared":false,"htmlHead":"<!-- Blog Schema by Front Row Insurance // https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/ -->\n\n<script type=\"application/ld+json\">\n {\n \"@context\": \"http://schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"BlogPosting\",\n \"mainEntityOfPage\":{\n \"@type\":\"WebPage\",\n \"@id\":\"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one\"\n },\n \"headline\": \"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One\",\n \"image\": {\n \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n \"url\": \"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg\"\n },\n \"datePublished\": \"2015-06-17 19:59:23\",\n \"dateModified\": \"\",\n \"author\": {\n \"@type\": \"Person\",\n \"name\": \"') }}\"\n },\n \"publisher\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"FRONT ROW INSURANCE BROKERS\",\n \"logo\": {\n \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n \"url\": \"https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/61352/images/Logos/FR_logo_%5BConverted,-Inverted%5D.png\"\n }\n },\n \"description\": \"Marvin Gaye vs. Robin Thicke and Pharrel Williams. Lawyer gives us the opportunity to learn his thought processes from all three of his perspectives.\"\n }\n </script>\n <!-- End Schema --> \n<script type=\"text/javascript\">\n window._mNHandle = window._mNHandle || {};\n window._mNHandle.queue = window._mNHandle.queue || [];\n medianet_versionId = \"3121199\";\n</script>\n<script src=\"https://contextual.media.net/dmedianet.js?cid=8CU76IWTZ\" async=\"async\"></script>","htmlHeadIsShared":true,"htmlKeywords":["Front Row Insurance Blog"," entertainment blog"," film blog"," film insurance"," event insurance"," film festival blog"," production blog"," musicians blog"," "],"htmlTitle":"The Front Row View (entertainment insurance blog)","id":952267656,"instantNotificationEmailId":"952268061","itemLayoutId":null,"itemTemplateIsShared":false,"itemTemplatePath":"prox_frontrow/templates/blog/blog-post.html","label":"The Front Row View (entertainment insurance blog)","language":"en","legacyGuid":"469ce2ec-4dd9-442d-984a-3bab2557a02f","legacyModuleId":"164112","legacyTabId":137640,"listingLayoutId":null,"listingPageId":70026589976,"listingTemplatePath":"prox_frontrow/templates/blog/blog-listing.html","liveDomain":"www.frontrowinsurance.com","monthFilterFormat":"MMMM yyyy","monthlyNotificationEmailId":"952267981","name":"The Front Row View (entertainment insurance blog)","parentBlogUpdateTaskId":null,"portalId":61352,"postHtmlFooter":"<!-- OMEGA-->","postHtmlHead":"<!-- Blog Schema by Front Row Insurance // https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/ -->\n\n<script type=\"application/ld+json\">\n {\n \"@context\": \"http://schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"BlogPosting\",\n \"mainEntityOfPage\":{\n \"@type\":\"WebPage\",\n \"@id\":\"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one\"\n },\n \"headline\": \"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One\",\n \"image\": {\n \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n \"url\": \"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg\"\n },\n \"datePublished\": \"2015-06-17 19:59:23\",\n \"dateModified\": \"\",\n \"author\": {\n \"@type\": \"Person\",\n \"name\": \"') }}\"\n },\n \"publisher\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"FRONT ROW INSURANCE BROKERS\",\n \"logo\": {\n \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n \"url\": \"https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/61352/images/Logos/FR_logo_%5BConverted,-Inverted%5D.png\"\n }\n },\n \"description\": \"Marvin Gaye vs. Robin Thicke and Pharrel Williams. Lawyer gives us the opportunity to learn his thought processes from all three of his perspectives.\"\n }\n </script>\n <!-- End Schema --> \n<script type=\"text/javascript\">\n window._mNHandle = window._mNHandle || {};\n window._mNHandle.queue = window._mNHandle.queue || [];\n medianet_versionId = \"3121199\";\n</script>\n<script src=\"https://contextual.media.net/dmedianet.js?cid=8CU76IWTZ\" async=\"async\"></script>","postsPerListingPage":10,"postsPerRssFeed":10,"publicAccessRules":[],"publicAccessRulesEnabled":false,"publicTitle":"The Front Row View (entertainment insurance blog)","publishDateFormat":"medium","resolvedDomain":"www.frontrowinsurance.com","rootUrl":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles","rssCustomFeed":"","rssDescription":"RSS feeds for ","rssItemFooter":"<IMG style=\"WIDTH: 144px; HEIGHT: 78px\" title=\"\" border=0 alt=\"\" align=center src=\"http://focusinsurance.web6.hubspot.com/Portals/61352/images//logo_final.jpg\" width=138 height=78 mce_src=\"/Portals/61352/images//logo_final.jpg\">","rssItemHeader":"","settingsOverrides":{"itemLayoutId":false,"itemTemplatePath":false,"itemTemplateIsShared":false,"listingLayoutId":false,"listingTemplatePath":false,"postsPerListingPage":false,"showSummaryInListing":false,"useFeaturedImageInSummary":false,"htmlHead":false,"postHtmlHead":false,"htmlHeadIsShared":false,"htmlFooter":false,"listingPageHtmlFooter":false,"postHtmlFooter":false,"htmlFooterIsShared":false,"attachedStylesheets":false,"postsPerRssFeed":false,"showSummaryInRss":false,"showSummaryInEmails":false,"showSummariesInEmails":false,"allowComments":false,"commentShouldCreateContact":false,"commentModeration":false,"closeCommentsOlder":false,"commentNotificationEmails":false,"commentMaxThreadDepth":false,"commentVerificationText":false,"socialAccountTwitter":false,"showSocialLinkTwitter":false,"showSocialLinkLinkedin":false,"showSocialLinkFacebook":false,"enableGoogleAmpOutput":false,"ampLogoSrc":false,"ampLogoHeight":false,"ampLogoWidth":false,"ampLogoAlt":false,"ampHeaderFont":false,"ampHeaderFontSize":false,"ampHeaderColor":false,"ampHeaderBackgroundColor":false,"ampBodyFont":false,"ampBodyFontSize":false,"ampBodyColor":false,"ampLinkColor":false,"generateJsonLdEnabled":false},"showSocialLinkFacebook":true,"showSocialLinkLinkedin":true,"showSocialLinkTwitter":true,"showSummaryInEmails":true,"showSummaryInListing":false,"showSummaryInRss":true,"siteId":0,"slug":"articles","socialAccountTwitter":"","state":null,"subscriptionContactsProperty":"blog_blog_the_front_row_view_subscription","subscriptionEmailType":null,"subscriptionFormGuid":"a2c254df-2214-4c54-bd51-46da1e3029fb","subscriptionListsByType":{"daily":12,"instant":11,"monthly":10,"weekly":13},"title":null,"translatedFromId":null,"translations":{"fr":{"absoluteUrl":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/fr/blogue","id":2471031463,"language":"fr","masterId":952267656,"name":"The Front Row View (entertainment insurance blog)","publicAccessRules":[],"publicAccessRulesEnabled":false,"slug":"fr/blogue"}},"updated":1693318083280,"updatedDateTime":1693318083280,"urlBase":"www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles","urlSegments":{},"useFeaturedImageInSummary":true,"usesDefaultTemplate":false,"weeklyNotificationEmailId":"952268106"},"password":null,"pastMabExperimentIds":[],"performableGuid":"","performableVariationLetter":null,"personas":[],"placementGuids":[],"portableKey":null,"portalId":61352,"position":null,"postBody":"\n\n\n\n <span id=\"hs_cos_wrapper_post_body\" class=\"hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_rich_text\" style=\"\" data-hs-cos-general-type=\"meta_field\" data-hs-cos-type=\"rich_text\" ><p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p></span>\n","postBodyRss":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p>","postEmailContent":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>","postFeaturedImageIfEnabled":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg","postListContent":"\n\n\n\n <span id=\"hs_cos_wrapper_post_body\" class=\"hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_rich_text\" style=\"\" data-hs-cos-general-type=\"meta_field\" data-hs-cos-type=\"rich_text\" ><p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p></span>\n","postListSummaryFeaturedImage":"","postRssContent":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>","postRssSummaryFeaturedImage":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg","postSummary":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n","postSummaryRss":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>","postTemplate":"prox_frontrow/templates/blog/blog-post.html","previewImageSrc":null,"previewKey":"o6yHgseE","previousPostFeaturedImage":"https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/61352/file-1305986183.jpg","previousPostFeaturedImageAltText":"Film Insurance Claims","previousPostName":"How To Call A Wrap On Top Film Insurance Claims","previousPostSlug":"articles/how-to-call-a-wrap-on-top-film-insurance-claims","processingStatus":"PUBLISHED","propertyForDynamicPageCanonicalUrl":null,"propertyForDynamicPageFeaturedImage":null,"propertyForDynamicPageMetaDescription":null,"propertyForDynamicPageSlug":null,"propertyForDynamicPageTitle":null,"publicAccessRules":[],"publicAccessRulesEnabled":false,"publishDate":1434571163000,"publishDateLocalTime":1434571163000,"publishDateLocalized":{"date":1434571163000,"format":"medium","language":"en_US"},"publishImmediately":true,"publishTimezoneOffset":null,"publishedAt":1706811681135,"publishedByEmail":null,"publishedById":7915797,"publishedByName":null,"publishedUrl":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one","resolvedDomain":"www.frontrowinsurance.com","resolvedLanguage":null,"rssBody":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines#Lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent music infringement lawsuit</a> between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">Williams over the songs </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Gaye) and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">(by Thicke/Williams) does exactly</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.</span></span></p>\n<h2>From the American lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<p>In comparing <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">and </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams</span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> </span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">meticulously copied the groove of </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Got to Give It Up</span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">. There are also some similarities in the bass line of</span></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\"> the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" face=\"Calibri\">Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary. </span></p>\n<p>What does the American music <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/102480/eo-insurance-for-film-and-tv-the-value-of-a-lawyer\" rel=\"noopener\">lawyer</a> typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).</p>\n<p>Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the jury.</span></p>\n<p>I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.<br></span> <span style=\"font-size: 18px;\"><span face=\"Calibri\"></span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most. </span></p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span face=\"Calibri\">completely ignore the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">point that out.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.</span> <span style=\"font-family: Calibri,Bold;\" face=\"Calibri,Bold\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></p>\n<h2 align=\"LEFT\">From the producer’s and composer’s perspective</h2>\n<p>In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting <a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\"noopener\">clearance reports</a> get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the <a href=\"/sectors/e-o-insurance\">“errors and omissions”</a> process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory.</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not. </span></p>\n<p>This “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/27709/film-eo-insurance-clearances-procedures-for-film-producers-part-1-of-3\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance process</a>” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain <span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.</span> </span></p>\n<p>If the results of the <em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal</span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">$7 million.</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"></span></span></p>\n<p>In other words, the “<a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/26544/script-insurance-clearance-reports-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important\" rel=\" noopener\">clearance reports</a>” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">what has to be removed. </span></p>\n<p>If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.</span></p>\n<p>I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!</p>\n<p>As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\"><span face=\"Calibri\">avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the </span><em><span face=\"Calibri,Italic\">Blurred Lines </span></em><span face=\"Calibri\">case, this approach may not work anymore. Some</span></span><span face=\"Calibri\"> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only <a href=\"/articles/music-licenses-for-non-original-music-used-in-a-film-production\" rel=\"noopener\">license</a> the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre?</span> <span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\" align=\"LEFT\">How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?</span> <br></span></p>\n<h2>Conclusion - Music Infringement Law</h2>\n<p>The <em>Blurred Lines</em> decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.</p>\n<p>It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams_v._Bridgeport_Music\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">filed an appeal of this decision</a>. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.</p>\n<p>I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong>--------------------</strong></span></span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"color: #666666; line-height: 1.25em;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #080008;\"><strong>JEFF YOUNG</strong></span><br></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\">- The Lawyer's Lawyer<br>- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP<br>- Music producer, composer<br>- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)</span></span></p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.15em;\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">Jeff Young</span></strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">,</span><span lang=\"EN-US\">&nbsp;J.D. | </span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">Barrister &amp; Solicitor | Trademark Agent</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> (Canada and US)</span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"mailto:jy@arenaltman.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0808f5;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\" size=\"3\">jy@arenaltman.com</span></span></a></span></span><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span size=\"3\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"> | Direct: 604.563.1192</span></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada </span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\">|<em>&nbsp;Member State Bar of California, USA </em></span><em><span lang=\"EN-US\">(inactive)</span></em><span lang=\"EN-US\"></span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><strong><span lang=\"EN-US\">ALTMAN &amp; COMPANY</span></strong><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\" lang=\"EN-US\"><span size=\"3\">&nbsp;| </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\">Business and Entertainment Law</span></span></span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman';\" face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"3\"> </span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#000000\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\" face=\"Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #666666;\">Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4</span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>\n<h3>Related:</h3>\n<p><a href=\"/musical-instrument-insurance-101\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-are-considerations-around-singers-performing-music-in-a-film\" rel=\"noopener\">Singers performing music in films: considerations</a><br><a href=\"/articles/what-about-when-film-producers-are-unable-to-obtain-music-rights\" rel=\"noopener\" id=\"__hsNewLink\">What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-theft-prevention-what-you-need-to-know\" rel=\" noopener\">Tips &amp; tricks to guard your gear </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205377/protecting-musical-instruments-at-home-insurance-and-more\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at home</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/205279/6-ways-to-protect-your-instruments-at-airports-and-on-planes\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments at airports </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118477/musical-gear-insurance-and-protection-while-on-tour\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting instruments on tour</a><br><a href=\"/articles/summer-and-tours-what-you-need-to-know-about-musical-tour-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Musical tour insurance </a><br><a href=\"/articles/band-on-the-run-touring-insurance-tips-for-taking-your-show-on-the-road\" rel=\" noopener\">Band on the run </a><br><a href=\"/articles/articles/bid/81594/why-even-your-band-should-carry-liability-insurance\" rel=\" noopener\">Tribute bands and liability </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-guitar\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your guitar</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-drums\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your drums</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-keyboard\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your keyboard</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-violin\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your violin</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/20-effective-ways-to-protect-your-saxophone\" rel=\" noopener\">Protecting your saxophone</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118532/stolen-musical-instruments-how-to-make-a-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">How to make a claim</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/191494/instrument-insurance-what-is-my-gear-worth-in-an-claim\" rel=\" noopener\">What is my gear worth in event of claim?</a><br><a href=\"/articles/musical-instrument-insurance-you-may-not-be-covered\" rel=\" noopener\">You may not be covered under homeowners</a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/118744/front-row-instrument-policy-launches-on-line\" rel=\" noopener\">Front Row’s musical instrument policy </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/117160/instrument-insurance-for-socan-members\" rel=\" noopener\">Insurance for SOCAN members </a><br><a href=\"/instrument-insurance-blog/bid/146779/musical-instrument-insurance-companies-how-to-compare\" rel=\" noopener\">How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.</a><br>Blurring the lines of music infringement law</p>","rssSummary":"<p style=\"text-align: right; font-size: 14px;\"><em>Image credit: Shutterstock</em></p>\n","rssSummaryFeaturedImage":"https://61352.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/61352/images/eando/gaye-forweb.jpg","scheduledUpdateDate":0,"screenshotPreviewTakenAt":1706811681891,"screenshotPreviewUrl":"https://cdn1.hubspot.net/hubshotv3/prod/e/0/9df8d85f-c035-4bb3-ace0-4de0e24883b9.png","sections":{},"securityState":"NONE","siteId":0,"slug":"articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one","stagedFrom":null,"state":"PUBLISHED","stateWhenDeleted":null,"styleOverrideId":null,"subcategory":"normal_blog_post","syncedWithBlogRoot":true,"tagIds":[949436814,949708814,949708924,2961176071],"tagList":[{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401900445000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949436814,"label":"Musical instrument insurance","language":"en","name":"Musical instrument insurance","portalId":61352,"slug":"musical-instrument-insurance","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1649857146996},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401901719000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949708814,"label":"Film insurance broker","language":"en","name":"Film insurance broker","portalId":61352,"slug":"film-insurance-broker","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1649863451156},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401901730000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949708924,"label":"Film producer's E&O insurance","language":"en","name":"Film producer's E&O insurance","portalId":61352,"slug":"film-producers-eo-insurance","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1666892193369},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1434565727000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":2961176071,"label":"Altman & Company","language":"en","name":"Altman & Company","portalId":61352,"slug":"altman-company","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1666899863346}],"tagNames":["Musical instrument insurance","Film insurance broker","Film producer's E&O insurance","Altman & Company"],"teamPerms":[],"templatePath":"","templatePathForRender":"prox_frontrow/templates/blog/blog-post.html","textToAudioFileId":null,"textToAudioGenerationRequestId":null,"themePath":null,"themeSettingsValues":null,"title":"Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One","tmsId":null,"topicIds":[949436814,949708814,949708924,2961176071],"topicList":[{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401900445000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949436814,"label":"Musical instrument insurance","language":"en","name":"Musical instrument insurance","portalId":61352,"slug":"musical-instrument-insurance","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1649857146996},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401901719000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949708814,"label":"Film insurance broker","language":"en","name":"Film insurance broker","portalId":61352,"slug":"film-insurance-broker","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1649863451156},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1401901730000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":949708924,"label":"Film producer's E&O insurance","language":"en","name":"Film producer's E&O insurance","portalId":61352,"slug":"film-producers-eo-insurance","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1666892193369},{"categoryId":0,"cdnPurgeEmbargoTime":null,"contentIds":[],"cosObjectType":"TAG","created":1434565727000,"deletedAt":0,"description":"","id":2961176071,"label":"Altman & Company","language":"en","name":"Altman & Company","portalId":61352,"slug":"altman-company","translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"updated":1666899863346}],"topicNames":["Musical instrument insurance","Film insurance broker","Film producer's E&O insurance","Altman & Company"],"topics":[949436814,949708814,949708924,2961176071],"translatedContent":{},"translatedFromId":null,"translations":{},"tweet":null,"tweetAt":null,"tweetImmediately":false,"unpublishedAt":0,"updated":1706811681141,"updatedById":7915797,"upsizeFeaturedImage":false,"url":"https://www.frontrowinsurance.com/articles/blurring-the-lines-of-music-infringement-law-three-perspectives-in-one","useFeaturedImage":true,"userPerms":[],"views":0,"visibleToAll":null,"widgetContainers":{"Sidebar_Modules":{"deleted_at":1562942492435,"widgets":[{"body":{"overrideable":false,"response_message":"Thanks for Subscribing!","select_blog":"default","title":"Subscribe to Email Updates"},"child_css":{},"css":{},"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":1489080911083,"label":"Blog Email Subscription","order":0,"type":"blog_subscribe"}]}},"widgetcontainers":{},"widgets":{"google_search":{"body":{"prefill_input_with_pathname":false,"search_button_text":"Search","search_field_label":"Search"},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"google_search","label":"google_search","name":"google_search","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"google_search"},"menu_footer_primary":{"body":{},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"menu_footer_primary","label":"Menu Footer Primary","name":"menu_footer_primary","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"menu"},"menu_footer_sector_categories":{"body":{},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"menu_footer_sector_categories","label":"Menu Footer Sector Categories","name":"menu_footer_sector_categories","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"menu"},"menu_header_all_sectors":{"body":{},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"menu_header_all_sectors","label":"Menu Header All Sectors","name":"menu_header_all_sectors","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"menu"},"menu_header_primary":{"body":{},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"menu_header_primary","label":"Menu Header Primary","name":"menu_header_primary","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"menu"},"menu_header_sector_categories":{"body":{},"child_css":{},"css":{},"definition_id":null,"deleted_at":1562942492435,"id":"menu_header_sector_categories","label":"Menu Header Sector Categories","name":"menu_header_sector_categories","smart_objects":[],"smart_type":null,"type":"menu"},"module_156398965931111":{"body":{"definition_id":null,"module_id":8696351,"path":"/Marketplace/HubSpot/Team_Member/Team Member","per_widget_wrapper_html":"","smart_objects":null,"smart_type":"NOT_SMART","tag":"module","type":"module","widget_name":"Team Member","wrapping_html":""},"child_css":{},"css":{},"deleted_at":1649859370533,"id":"module_156398965931111","label":"Team Member","module_id":8696351,"name":"module_156398965931111","order":9,"smart_type":null,"styles":{},"type":"module"}}}

Blurring the Lines of Music Infringement Law - 3 Perspectives in One

Marvin Gaye sidewalk star

Image credit: Shutterstock

For many years of my life, I have had the pleasure of enjoying three simultaneous careers. I am a senior member of the Bar of British Columbia, Canada focusing on entertainment law, I am a member of the State Bar of California, USA, regularly dealing with my colleagues in Hollywood, and I am a music producer and composer with a current co-write on the radio and a cue on a currently airing TV show. Very rarely does a legal case affect me in all three of my careers at once. The recent music infringement lawsuit between the Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams over the songs Got to Give It Up (by Gaye) and Blurred Lines (by Thicke/Williams) does exactly this. As a result, I thought it would be interesting to present my commentary from all three of these perspectives, separately.

From the American lawyer’s perspective

The general understanding among attorneys practicing music law in America is that a composition infringes on another when there are substantial similarities between the melodies of one song versus that of another. The precedent setting cases have all generally ruled that similarities in chord progressions and general rhythmic feel – or as some would call it, the “groove” – does not constitute infringement. You need to have melodies that sound alike. In fact, mere similarities in the groove of a song is usually considered a genre. There is no copyright in a genre and there is no copyright in a chord progression.

In comparing Blurred Lines and Got to Give It Up, there is clear evidence that Thicke and Williams meticulously copied the groove of Got to Give It Up. There are also some similarities in the bass line of the two songs, but those similarities do not seem substantial. On a pure legal analysis, it would not seem like this was a case of infringement. However, the case went to a jury, who may have been influenced by the apparent bad attitude and demeanor of Robin Thicke in court. Also, no one in the public has seen the musicologist reports that stated that there was in fact compositional infringement, not just a copying of a feel, groove or genre.

Furthermore, jury decisions only decide individual cases based on fact. No reasons are delivered and technically, no legal precedent is set. The message to any disgruntled music creator is that regardless of the existing law and established precedents, if you take an infringement case to a jury, you may still win if you can convince them there was some form of copying, regardless of what aspects were copied and what the legal precedents say to the contrary.

What does the American music lawyer typically say when asked by a client who wants advice on what they can do before going into the recording studio? Prior to this decision, the advice given would be that the client can copy a feel, groove or genre, but you cannot copy melody lines, hooks (or lyrics, if any).

Following this advice, the client is told that they will likely avoid a lawsuit because prior cases have held that it is reasonable to assume that we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music that we listen to and like, and that alone does not amount to an infringement. Now, while the American attorney can still technically say that the law really hasn’t changed, he or she will now have to further advise the client that any disgruntled music creator can still file a lawsuit, choose a jury trial, and convince the jury that there is infringement anyways – particularly if that client isn’t liked by the jury.

I have always believed that certain issues such as music copyright infringement should not be submitted to juries because juries lack the legal training necessary to make the correct legal decision. There is a tendency to ignore established law and go with what seems intuitively right based only on the facts, and decide accordingly, sometimes even when the judge’s instructions are otherwise. That leads to bad law. Juries in America are not obliged to give reasons, so we will never be able to tell if they understood what the law really was to begin with. This kind of uncertainty is scary. Really scary.

From the Canadian lawyer’s perspective

Canadian music lawyers will likely never face a case like this one. Music infringement cases are not decided by juries in Canada. They will be decided by judges who must provide legal reasons that at least can be appealed if the reasons appear incorrect. Also, an American trial jury decision with no reasons provided has no legal weight as precedent in Canada. So as a Canadian music lawyer, if a client asks me how to avoid infringement, I would still advise that you can copy a feel, groove or genre, but avoid copying melody lines (and lyrics, if applicable) and you are likely going to avoid a lawsuit because we are all influenced by the feel, groove and genre of the music we listen to and like the most.

However, most clients that come to me in Canada don’t just want a Canadian hit. Their dream is to have a hit in America. Therefore, it would not make sense for Canadian lawyers to completely ignore the Blurred Lines decision. In other words, while this decision has no formal effect on Canadian law, it will likely have some effect on Canadian music creators, especially those whose creative works cross the border, and it would be unwise for a Canadian entertainment lawyer to not point that out.

What is the result for Canada? Well, we now have one single jury in America rendering a decision (a decision involving their own interpretation of music law that they do not have to provide reasons or account to anyone else for) likely affecting the future behavior of most of the music creators in another country for a long time to come, even though the law of their own country does not require them to behave that way. Bizarre.

From the producer’s and composer’s perspective

In the film industry, scripts are reviewed, potential infringements are identified, and the resulting clearance reports get sent to entertainment lawyers to review and to render opinions as to whether changes to the scripts are needed. This is all part of the “errors and omissions” process that because of the history of lawsuits in that industry, has become common and standard, if not virtually mandatory. Basically, the lawyers have to tell the filmmakers what is allowed on the screen, or not.

This “clearance process” also happens, in a lesser degree, with books. Literary publishers often retain lawyers to engage in a “libel read” of a book to identify possible legal risks before the book is released, and sometimes, risky portions of the book are edited out.

If the results of the Blurred Lines case continue in future jury decisions in this manner, the state of legal uncertainly may become such that major labels releasing records may become so concerned that they will have to adapt a similar process for the music industry. After all, this case resulted in verdict of over $7 million.

In other words, the “clearance reports” will have to be done by qualified musicologists who will review the entire album and identify potentially infringing phrases or “hooks”, and then submit those musicology reports to entertainment lawyers who will then render opinions on what can be left in and what has to be removed.

If this sounds ridiculous, I would remind you that I’m sure this seemed as ridiculous to filmmakers and book authors of past eras, but lawsuits in those industries have now made clearances commonplace. Basically, lawyers will have to tell the music producer what is allowed on the records, or not.

I’m not sure I would ever like this – even if I’m the lawyer clearing my own work!

As a composer, I am often asked by film directors to create “sound-alikes”, especially when the film is independently made and there is no budget to license a major hit song. A “sound-alike” is a music cue that copies a feel, groove or genre, but does not copy melody lines (or lyrics, if applicable) in order to avoid a lawsuit. Now, in view of the Blurred Lines case, this approach may not work anymore. Some questions that arise for the music composer: Is it reasonable to force all of these independent films to only license the hit music track when the director is only looking for a similar feel, groove or genre? How will these multi-million dollar awards affect the future careers of upcoming composers if they are living in fear of lawsuits for everything they try to create with an established feel, groove or genre?

Conclusion - Music Infringement Law

The Blurred Lines decision introduces significant uncertainty into music infringement laws. This uncertainty is aggravated by the fact that juries are not required to render reasons for their decisions.

It is my understanding that Thicke and Pharrell have filed an appeal of this decision. I sincerely hope that the appeal will succeed at least in part – specifically, from the point of getting clarity on the legal principles involved.

I am much more concerned about that than which side winds up with the $7M. I just want the lines of music infringement law to be less blurred!

--------------------

JEFF YOUNG
- The Lawyer's Lawyer
- Educator and formerly practiced in-house with VANOC and UBCP
- Music producer, composer
- Called in BC (1988) and California (2010)

Jeff Young, J.D. | Barrister & Solicitor | Trademark Agent (Canada and US) jy@arenaltman.com | Direct: 604.563.1192 Member Law Society of British Columbia, Canada | Member State Bar of California, USA (inactive) ALTMAN & COMPANY | Business and Entertainment Law Suite #202 – 2245 West Broadway Ave., Vancouver BC V6K 2E4

Related:

Musical Instrument Insurance 101: How to Protect Your Instruments
Singers performing music in films: considerations
What about when producers are unable to obtain music rights?
Tips & tricks to guard your gear
Protecting instruments at home
Protecting instruments at airports
Protecting instruments on tour
Musical tour insurance
Band on the run
Tribute bands and liability
Protecting your guitar
Protecting your drums
Protecting your keyboard
Protecting your violin
Protecting your saxophone
How to make a claim
What is my gear worth in event of claim?
You may not be covered under homeowners
Front Row’s musical instrument policy
Insurance for SOCAN members
How to compare musical instrument insurance cos.
Blurring the lines of music infringement law

Submit a comment